Post-Game Talk: Jets 7 - Avs 6, Jets lead series 1-0

Status
Not open for further replies.

JetsWillFly4Ever

Registered User
May 21, 2011
6,305
9,317
Winnipeg MB.
I'd be a little concerned about putting Schmidt in for Stanley. Stan is in because Schmidt looked awful the last 3 weeks of the season. Last night was tough on all d with crazy for check pressure. Demelo might have been the worst and we aren't talking about pulling him.
Demelo also has a much different track record than Stanley.

Stanley had a few good games but has also been bad now for the last little while IMO. Schmidt allows Samberg to back to his natural side, and is a vet who has played in many playoff games. I would go that route, personally.
 

Jet

Free Capo!
Jul 20, 2004
33,488
33,194
Florida
I'd be a little concerned about putting Schmidt in for Stanley. Stan is in because Schmidt looked awful the last 3 weeks of the season. Last night was tough on all d with crazy for check pressure. Demelo might have been the worst and we aren't talking about pulling him.
I'd give them at least another game to sort it out. I've liked that pair together.

Pionk on the other hand oooooh boy. He was directly or indirectly responsible for at least a couple goals last night. He just panics with the puck and blindly throws it up the wall.

It'll never happen but I'd put Miller in for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

Channelcat

Unhinged user
Feb 8, 2013
18,479
14,759
Canada
I'd give them at least another game to sort it out. I've liked that pair together.

Pionk on the other hand oooooh boy. He was directly or indirectly responsible for at least a couple goals last night. He just panics with the puck and blindly throws it up the wall.

It'll never happen but I'd put Miller in for him.
Miller for Pionk? That's crazy talk bro! Yes, Pionk made those mistakes, but he made a bunch of outstanding plays as he always does.

Re: StanBerg
There was a few times yesterday when I was thinking back to 88-54 and what a good shutdown pair that was earlier in the season, but I can also imagine how 88 may have gotten totally worked over in that game. That game was a nightmare for d (both teams) with the speed through the neutral zone and the relentless forecheck
 

rkp

Registered User
Mar 31, 2011
3,018
2,305
Each playoff series is not unlike a tv mini series.....and this "mini-series" opened up with a bang..."strap on your seatbelts...u could be in for one heck of a ride!!!".....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Upperdeckjet

JetsUK

Registered User
Oct 1, 2015
6,893
14,685
Ehlers had a couple of puck management gaffes in shitty spots but that's kinda what you get with him

Otherwise I though he was flying out there and looked dangerous

Agree. Thought he was excellent, with a few wicked shots off rushes and some fine setups and D play -- had Toffoli opened his eyes he had Eels wide open in front of the net for a tap in early.

KFC was terrific -- I'd have bought a lottery ticket had I not been in shock as he delivered a series of crushing checks on the attack. Absolutely brilliant gane from him all over the ice, along with 55 and Cap'n. Liked Vilardi's game for the most part also, though he was scuffing pucks.

Pionk -- no point going over it. Some nightmare plays from him, again, even with the stakes higher. Stan's lack of footspeed and balance showed also -- lucky to not get called on some of those flails after a player once the play had already been made. Still think 88 is a good bet, or the guy we spent picks on, so Samberg can play his natural side, and maybe push Pionk down to 3rd. Dillon and even DD looked slow and awkward at times -- felt like the whole D had Pionk Flu.

Too much given up in the NZ, and at the blueline. Too many lazy chips out along the boards when there were better options, etc. The Jets looked shell-shocked for parts of the 1st and 3rd, and while the PP for both units looked good it's hard to know how or why last year's solid PK has been redesigned to be so much crapper, despite stronger personnel.

But -- that was a high-octane win, and if they can settle things down and stifle the Avs attack early next game while converting on their chances they're in with a real shot heading to COL.

Envious of those who were there -- that was one for the history books.

And that Lowry goal was sheer billiards.
 
Last edited:

wpgallday1960

Registered User
Sponsor
Jun 4, 2010
2,929
2,740
Sunny St. James
Agree. Thought he was excellent, with a few wicked shots off rushes and some fine setups and D play -- had Toffoli opened his eyes he had Eels wide open in front of the net for a tap in early.

KFC was terrific -- I'd have bought a lottery ticket had I not been in shock as he delivered a series of crushing checks on the attack. Absolutely brilliant gane from him all over the ice, along with 55 and Cap'n. Liked Vilardi's game for the most part also, though he was scuffing pucks.

Pionk -- no point going over it. Some nightmare plays from him, again, even with the stakes higher. Stan's lack of footspeed and balance showed also -- lucky to not get called on some of those flails after a player once the play had already been made. Still think 88 is a good bet, or the guy we spent picks on, so Samberg can play his natural side, and maybe push Pionk down to 3rd. Dillon and even DD looked slow and awkward at times -- felt like the whole D had Pionk Flu.

Too much given up in the NZ, and at the blueline. Too many lazy chips out along the boards when there were better options, etc. The Jets looked shell-shocked for parts of the 1st and 3rd, and while the PP for both units looked good it's hard to know how or why last year's solid PK has been redesigned to be so much crapper, despite stronger personnel.

But -- that was a high-octane win, and if they can settle things down and stifle the Avs attack early next game while converting on their chances they're in with a real shot heading to COL.

Envious of those who were there -- that was one for the history books.

And that Lowry goal was sheer billiards.
That’s one thing about Stan that worries me here. He is big and slow and can get burned by Avs fast forwards. IMO he didn’t have a good game and neither did Samberg. At most one more game to see if they can return to form.
 

Wedgeden

Registered User
Mar 31, 2012
756
1,431
Great offense in the game by the Jets, apparently we were just holding back the goal scoring for the playoffs. :naughty: Lots to clean up after that game but bottom line we got the win and was that a exciting game. Now we boogie-woogie.

You finally watched it? Lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Jets 31

Zhamnov5GoalGame

Former Director of GDT Operations
Jan 14, 2012
6,642
13,334
Winnipeg, MB, Canada
MORE! Seriously though, it seemed like every "important" faceoff was won by the Avs. Important being in our zone.
Well that last faceoff was won cleanly by the Jets and ended any hope they had of tieing the game in the last 30'ish seconds. They kept displaying the FO% stats for the games and our big guns were over 50 so I thought we did better than most perceived.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jokesondee

Zhamnov5GoalGame

Former Director of GDT Operations
Jan 14, 2012
6,642
13,334
Winnipeg, MB, Canada
I'd be a little concerned about putting Schmidt in for Stanley. Stan is in because Schmidt looked awful the last 3 weeks of the season. Last night was tough on all d with crazy for check pressure. Demelo might have been the worst and we aren't talking about pulling him.
Probably, but Stan was also in because HE looked good for a while. His game slipped majorly in games 81 & 82 and he looked really bad last night. He was losing a lot of physical battles (huh?) and is crazy slow. Nate's best stretch of the season was after a multi game benching. That's when him and Samberg went on their good run. I guess give Stan another start but I'd want to see the swap for Game 3 if we lose or if Stan's decline continues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Channelcat

Maukkis

EZ4ENCE
Mar 16, 2016
10,666
7,495
Man, Georgiev is so not seeing the end of this series. Seven goals allowed on 2.16 expected goals against. Anything remotely close to average goaltending gets the Avs the win in that game, but we were bailed out big time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Royale With Cheese

ps241

The Ballad of Ville Bobby
Sponsor
Mar 10, 2010
34,990
31,668
It's been awhile since Ive seen a game as sloppy as this one but it was great fun to watch. I couldn't believe the noise in the arena and I can see why Inanna has to avoid games, I'm almost hearing impaired myself after sitting thru that. Stanley definitely needs to be PB even Schmidt would be an improvement. Lowry is just incredible and some shifts I ignored the puck and just watched him. Those Avs are far from done but I like our chances if we can jst tighten up defensively.

Funny you would mention this but my Apple watch kept blowing up last night with Noise warnings and it happened so often I wouldn't take it the next game.
 

Zhamnov5GoalGame

Former Director of GDT Operations
Jan 14, 2012
6,642
13,334
Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Man, Georgiev is so not seeing the end of this series. Seven goals allowed on 2.16 expected goals against. Anything remotely close to average goaltending gets the Avs the win in that game, but we were bailed out big time.
The expected goals stats rarely make much sense to me.
I don't see how he stops 5 of the 7 goals (according to the stats) and we also missed on some juicy chances that looked like for sure goals.

What I know is we got completely owned from puck drop until around the time that Morrissey scored. Then things settled into the hot mess (for both teams) that led to this high scoring baseball score.
 
Nov 24, 2006
8,211
14,683
I am really worried about Helly, come playoff time he is never the same goalie as the regular season. I hope they don’t live and die with him because Brossoit is very capable of getting it done.
It's weird, but he does seem to be a different (worse) goalie in the playoffs, doesn't he.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrvJets

Adam da bomb

Registered User
May 1, 2016
12,851
9,780
Man, Georgiev is so not seeing the end of this series. Seven goals allowed on 2.16 expected goals against. Anything remotely close to average goaltending gets the Avs the win in that game, but we were bailed out big time.
Yes we were bailed out by spending money on a good goalie not a superstar like MacKinnon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffdog

Maukkis

EZ4ENCE
Mar 16, 2016
10,666
7,495
The expected goals stats rarely make much sense to me.
I don't see how he stops 5 of the 7 goals (according to the stats) and we also missed on some juicy chances that looked like for sure goals.

What I know is we got completely owned from puck drop until around the time that Morrissey scored. Then things settled into the hot mess (for both teams) that led to this high scoring baseball score.
Short answer: goals are rare, which muddles the numbers in an individual game. However, you can't polish a turd, and that's exactly what Georgiev turned in. The fact that we generated so little offense only makes the numbers look worse, as everything went in.

Looking at the actual goals that happened, I reckon you'd want Georgiev to have at least two of the seven (JoMo, Lowry #1, maybe Connor #1). Colorado's net front presence didn't exactly shine in all of the seven goals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad