Movies: Horror Movie Discussion

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,602
5,264
Thought the opening scene of Children of the Corn was pretty good. Very creepy and sort of sets the tone. It is the scene in the restaurant that I am talking about. By the way, I have no idea why they don't kill the waitress who looks like she's 50 that partakes in the murders. Anyway, I agree the movie is slow, and a good start isn't followed by anything classic. Linda Hamilton made this right around the same time as Terminator. She is good in this movie. I do remember that she complains a bit to Peter Horton's character that he hasn't made a commitment to marry her yet. Then the kids show up and you know the rest.

I think the opening is pretty much the only scene with gore and blood to set up the children as evil. It's probably the most memorable scene in the movie, aside from the very end (imo). I think both Peter Horton and Linda Hamilton added some spunk to their characters, I just wish there was more there in terms of depth. Spoilers, I kinda hinted at it in my review, but you could remove both Hamilton/Horton and the events would pretty much play out the same. The main conflict was between the children (Isaac and Malachai), and it's not influenced at all by the protagonists. I thought that hurt the overall product given how much time we spend with Hamilton and Horton meandering around, and has made me wonder if the movie would work better as a short film. In my research, I found out there actually is a short film, and it predates this movie. It came out in 1983 and is called Disciples of the Crow. It's only 18 minutes and is on Youtube, so I may as well check it out at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pranzo Oltranzista

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,602
5,264
MV5BODcyNjRlNGEtNTNmYS00NzhlLThjMjQtMjkzNDQwODIyZGVmXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjUyNDk2ODc@._V1_.jpg


Children of the Corn: Revelation (2001) - 2/10

A woman searching for her missing grandma is stalked by two mysterious children.

Claudette Mink stars as Jamie, a woman who travels to Omaha, Nebraska after her grandmother Hattie (Louise Grant) stops returning her calls. Jamie investigates her grandmother's apartment building, finding it run down and on the verge of being condemned, with the remaining tenants all receiving eviction notices. Hattie isn't in her apartment, so Jamie files a missing persons report with Detective Armbister (Kyle Cassie), who recommends Jamie stay at her grandma's apartment in case she returns home. However, while there Jamie finds herself being stalked by two creepy children (Jeffrey Ballard and Taylor Hobbs), as well as a mysterious man in black (Michael Ironside)...

Children of the Corn: Revelation was directed by Guy Magar and written by S.J. Smith. The seventh Children of the Corn movie and the fifth direct-to-video entry, Revelation was originally intended as a remake before eventually being adapted into another sequel. How does it fare?

It's bad... really bad. I knew I was in trouble once I saw this film's poster, and in even more trouble after a jarring opening scene that is followed by blurry opening credits where the sound is bizarrely mixed down so low that I thought I accidentally muted the video. Needless to say, five minutes into the movie I was extremely concerned.

However, the first 20 minutes actually weren't too bad. The set up and premise are sort of like a weird mix between Evil Dead Rise (2023) and Hellraiser: Deader (2005), with our protagonist Jamie traveling to a creepy apartment building intent on solving the mystery of her grandmother's disappearance. Jamie is a shallow character who I think is supposed to be a writer (she mentioned a deadline at one point, yet has no computer or writing materials), but at least her motivations are clear. Either way, we follow her as she investigates the nearby town... which is supposedly Omaha, but only contains a couple alleyways and a single convenience store. Let's just say it's the outskirts of Omaha, okay?

After a decent-ish opening act, the movie goes downhill like a runaway train. As Jamie investigates the boring mystery of her grandma's whereabouts (which the audience learns the answer to at least 30 minutes before she does - great mystery!), the miscellaneous apartment tenants are picked off. And let me tell you, these tenants are horrible: a drug dealer, an exotic dancer, a paranoid weapons collector, and a wheelchair bound man with Tourettes Syndrome. Most of these characters are played over-the-top (I'm not sure how else they could be played), but the movie tries to play things straight, which as you can imagine lowers the overall quality of the scenes. Speaking of low quality, most of the music in this film is public domain. There is some music credited - all to artist Steve Edwards - but for the most part the film only has generic incidental music. I think the opening credits were mixed so low because it was probably some random public domain song.

Revelation keeps trying to remind you this is supposed to be a Children of the Corn movie by including corn in bizarre ways; there are cornstalks outside the apartment, corn cobs are lobbed at characters a few times, someone bites into corn and there is blood inside, etc. This is such a weird tactic because the actual corn is a very small part of what this franchise is about. It would be like if they made a Friday the 13th sequel and kept trying to incorporate the weekday of Friday into the main events. And this on-the-nose usage of corn can't cover for the fact that this isn't really a Children of the Corn movie. The city of Gatlin and "He Who Walks Behind The Rows" get name dropped towards the end of the movie, but for the most part there is no series lore in this entry. The movie instead feels like (but isn't) a ghost story. For most of the run time there are only two children, one of whom looks like the I Like Turtles kid. Oh yeah, another 82 minute run time for this Children of the Corn sequel. In this case I'll call the movie mercifully short.

Maybe things would have been more tolerable if Children of the Corn: Revelation had upped the gore, but there's not much in this film. Most of the deaths are very tame, with the most extreme kill happening off camera. A lot of the deaths are flat out cheesy, with one character dying of a heart attack (I think?) and another being killed by rows of corn in their bathtub (a horrendously edited sequence). Adding insult to injury, the special effects are unacceptable and are probably the worst part of this movie. There's one death in the middle of the movie that involves a computer effect and is supposed to be sad, but is instead absolutely hilarious. Later on, we have moments with computer generated explosions and fire, as well as with CGI cornstalks rising from the ground. These effects look like they were done using early 2000's Windows Movie Maker, and so many of them occur in rapid succession during the film's climax that you can't look past them. The beginning of the film isn't great, but because of how awful the end of the movie is, this photo does Revelation more justice than any written review ever could:

2siu6l.jpg


Overall, Children of the Corn: Revelation is another horrible horror movie with the word "Revelation" in its title. Despite being made only two years after its predecessor, this film feels completely disconnected from the rest of the franchise and the most pointless overall. I think a lot of people would give this movie a "1", but in my opinion plenty of lower quality movies exist (i.e. 2014's Leprechaun: Origins). Either way, whether I rate it a "2" or a "1", the movie is trash and is comfortably the worst of the first seven Children of the Corn movies. I could not find any budget or earnings information for this direct-to-video sequel, but it's worth noting the Children of the Corn franchise went into a 10 year hiatus following this film.
 

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,602
5,264
Children-of-the-Corn-2009.jpg


Children of the Corn (2009) - 5/10

After an accident, a young couple searches for help in a town taken over by a cult of children.

David Anders and Kandyse McClure as Burt and Vicky, who in the mid-1970's are traveling through Nebraska. While driving down an isolated rural road, a young boy jumps out from the cornfields in front of their car. They head to the nearby city of Gatlin for help, but find it to be a ghost town, populated only by children in a demonic cult who murder anyone over the age of 18...

Children of the Corn was directed by Donald P. Borchers and written by Borchers and Stephen King. Borchers was a producer on the original 1984 film, but over time believed the film was not close enough to the original short story. Now in the director's chair, Borchers tried to involve author Stephen King in the creative process, but King declined. However, after Borchers sent him an early cut of the movie, King liked how close it was to his source material and agreed to being listed as a screenwriter. This was the first Children of the Corn movie made-for-TV, airing on the newly rebranded SyFy network. How does it fare?

It's mediocre....which for this series puts it in elite company! As Children of the Corn '09 more closely follows the novel than Corn '84, it means this time around Burt and Vicky are married. It also means they hate each other, and sequently we the audience hate them. Both characters are vile dirt, who are emotionally, physically, and verbally abusive to each other. The movie doesn't really say where they're headed (supposedly somewhere for a second honeymoon?), all we know is this marriage ended a long time ago.

Starting a movie by watching two characters you hate is never good, but the film peels back (some) layers of their relationship later on, and the characters become more tolerable when not actively abusing each other. Just like in the 1984 movie, Burt and Vicky spend a lot of time driving around, but this in this film their crumbling relationship at least makes the scenes in the car have more meat on the bone. No, I wouldn't say these two are the deepest characters ever, but there is more nuance given to them than Linda Hamilton and Peter Horton got.

On the flip side, the children in the "He Who Walks Behind The Rows" cult aren't quite as memorable as in the original film, but it's made up for because the events surrounding them are better. Even though this movie follows a lot of the same beats as the original film, the direction and pacing are both better, so the film doesn't drag nearly as much. Despite being a made-for-TV movie, Children of the Corn is a pretty gory movie and the children in this one are vicious, which creates a sense of unease.

That's not to say there aren't other problems. The 1984 movie is a donut film, with a decent beginning and ending but horrible second act. Children of the Corn '09 actually feels like the opposite, where the filmmakers figured out how to make an interesting second act, but at the cost of poor bookends. Being as vague as possible, I really liked the ending of the movie. However, the build up to that ending felt like a non-sensical fever dream that was devoid of tension, which made me start losing interest in what was going on (hey, at least it didn't make me fall asleep, am I right!?).

Overall, Children of the Corn '09 is an average TV movie. Though I wouldn't recommend anyone run out and watch it, in my opinion it's more consistently entertaining than the 1984 film. However, I think the 2-3 best scenes from that movie top anything you'll find in this one. Children of the Corn '09 had a $2M budget, but I could not find any earnings/viewership information. (Note: I watched the uncut version of Children of the Corn '09 for this review).
 

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,343
9,850
Fun fact: None of the eleven Children of the Corn movies were filmed in Nebraska, where nearly all take place. I wonder why. The state missed out on a great tourism opportunity. "Come to Nebraska. Join a cult. No grown-ups. All the corn you can eat."
 

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
55,354
44,737
Hell baby
The Strangers Chapter One


Clear money grab. It’s the first movie without the suspense that movie did incredibly well. It’s just mean-spirited. I didn’t walk out but I went into this movie blind without reading reviews, turned to the person I went with, said “this is a pile of shit”, and then immediately checked rotten tomatoes and saw 13%. Good to know that I know what I’m watching lmao

Movie is so drawn out and you can tell they were doing it because they only have so much story and they’re making 3 movies out of it. I’ll go watch the next one because I have a monthly pass for my local theater and don’t have to pay for the ticket but god damn.

2.8/10
 
Last edited:

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,602
5,264
c0f27e960346c35f323670cb0847169cdf51edbcfe0a0308cf4f534db8946710._SX1080_FMpng_.png


Children of the Corn: Genesis (2011) - 2/10

A couple broken down in rural California spends the night with a strange couple harboring a secret.

Kelen Coleman and Tim Rock star as Allie and Tim, an expecting couple who break down in a remote area of California. They seek help from the only people nearby, a strange Preacher (Billy Drago) and his much younger immigrant wife Oksana (Barbara Nedeljakova). Allie and Tim call a tow truck for help, but being that it's a Sunday wouldn't arrive for several hours and would cost an exorbitant price. The Preacher and Osanka allow the two to stay at their farmhouse, under the condition that they stay in the room after dark. However, the couple hear troubling noises during the night and go out to investigate...

Children of the Corn: Genesis was written and directed by Joel Soisson. The ninth Children of the Corn movie, Genesis was rushed into production after Dimension was on the verge of losing the series rights due to a 10 year production hiatus following 2001's Children of Corn: Revelation (2009's Children of the Corn was made by the SyFy Network). How does it fare?

Take a wild guess. Released under the "Dimension Extreme" label, Children of the Corn: Genesis came out the same year and had the same genesis/origin story (maintaining series rights) as the horrible Dimension "Extreme" movie Hellraiser: Revelations. To say I went into this movie with low expectations would be a severe understatement.

However, the opening scene wasn't too bad, though as you can probably tell from my rating things went downhill pretty quickly. In this painfully low budget movie, for the vast majority of the run time there are only four characters. Allie and Tim, our protagonists, are halfway decent; if nothing else, they at least have a bit of charisma. By comparison, the Preacher and Oksana are almost like caricatures, who are supposed to come off as creepy but instead come off as hokey.

In addition to the mixed bag characters, Children of the Corn: Genesis has fewer sets than Night of the Living Dead (1968). Preacher lives in a small, dilapidated farm house, of which we only see a handful of rooms. Otherwise, the movie is set outdoors, with the only visual contrast coming from the time of day it is (day or night). With all that in mind, the question is this: can the film overcome its limited means and get the audience invested in the story of Allie and Tim trying to find out what's going on with the Preacher and Oksana?

I can answer that question: no, no it does not. I used the word "pointless" during my review of Children of the Corn: Revelations (2001), and I regret that because Genesis may be the most pointless movie I've ever seen. Seriously, such little happens in this movie that it makes the plot of Revelations look like Inception (2010). After the initial set up, Genesis struggles to show the audience anything interesting, and mostly fills time with nonsensical exposition scenes. Adding insult to injury, Allie and Tim start making idiot plot decisions to keep the movie going, which removes any goodwill they built up with the audience early on. By the time the ending rolls around - an ending, by the way, that it so insanely random and divorced from the rest of the movie I don't even know if it's possible to spoil - you'll be completely uninvested.

What does any of this have to do with Children of the Corn? Not much. As mentioned, Genesis takes place in California, with a lone scene in Gatlin, Nebraska. The film tries to shoehorn in the series lore, but at the end of the day this movie feels pretty far removed from the Children of the Corn series. That's not necessarily a bad thing considering the overall low quality of the franchise, but Genesis just adds to that low quality and arguably lowers it further. Instead of being a lean-and-mean independent film that tries to do its own thing, this movie feels like exactly what it is: something crapped out to keep the franchise rights. Though I would argue Children of Corn: Revelation is a worse movie in a conventional sense, Genesis is a bigger waste of time.

Overall, Children of the Corn: Genesis is another bad Children of the Corn movie. I accidentally watched this movie over a week ago, prior to watching the 2009 SyFy remake as I didn't realize it existed. However, nothing was lost being as that is a remake, and this has no ties to previous sequels (and barely any ties to the series lore). I could not find any budget or earnings information for Genesis, but it would not shock me at all if this thing's budget was like $200K. A sequel written by Soisson, Children of the Corn: Runaway, was released in 2018.
 
Last edited:

Neil Racki

Registered User
May 2, 2018
4,796
5,139
Baltimore-ish
fedc5894e6eedd4f43e9518ce34a14e17dc0e69a_hq[1].gif


Me and my 12 yr old daughter bond over movies .. mostly horror movies.

Watched People Under the Stairs on Friday .. movie is a classic. She loved it. Didnt pickup on the dad implying being a rapey pedo when i watched it 30 years ago so when that slyly got introduced I had a minor heart attack. Thank god it was subtle
 

Nakatomi

Registered User
Dec 26, 2022
114
156
White Settlers (also called The Blood Lands) from 2014 - 3/10

A very by-the-numbers home invasion flick. English couple finds a beat up old property in Scotland. Drives up to check it out. Much making fun of Scottish people ensues.

Just, completely predictable throughout. Not much to recommend in this one. It did absolutely nothing in a unique or impressive way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pranzo Oltranzista

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad