Hockey Duckie
Registered User
just thought maybe you'd like a little insight into why people view you as such
You mean how people lash out at me and then blame me for them lashing out on me? Converse with facts and it stays on facts. Attack the person instead of the conversation, well then, it's not really a conversation at that point. Or they ask a question and I respond in full, but their response is to not read what I wrote and just lash out at me feels disingenuous b/c, again, it's an attack on me than on the conversation.
I actually do take the time to do the research, collect info, tabulate info, and share the info. Do posters realize how much time and work is needed for that? Do poster know I have excel tables spanning back to 2021-22 to develop a track record? Nope. People get angry with facts that they attack the person than the facts. Is feeling 1 point better than last year's group that significant of an improvement? All empirical data states no. Any layman will say no too.
If the team is to improve, then you gotta know what we're not doing well. If we're doing well, then WTF are we doing in the bottom-3 again and only 1 point better than last year. I'm not delusional, I'm factual. That's why posters are angry with my posts and attack me than the conversation.