BoxOfChocolates
Registered User
- Mar 7, 2010
- 11,453
- 1,616
Are Nate and Mikko going to show up at all? Or just going to wait for the PP
George also let it another shit goal.so let me get this straight
G smacks a 96 mph'r
georgie played a good puck AND is making key saves
and sheiffle needs a smackdown
about right?
Also how the f*** does it happen that in the year of our lord 2024 is there not enough camera angles and tech to make sure every goal line and blue line challenge conclusive?
Cheapskate joke league
Disagree. Call on the ice was good goal. We saw the video. No way Bednar and CO saw something that served as 100% conclusive proof that it was offside.....
They honestly look like they are waiting for PPs only.Are Nate and Mikko going to show up at all? Or just going to wait for the PP
Wood nearly lost the period for the Avs at the end there with that weak play up the boards.
Avs showed some dominance but in the end the period was pretty even. Avs got bailed out by George a bit.
Mikko is playing like he has all year. Mack looks injured or completely worn out. His normal playoff energy juat hasn't been there but in small doses.Are Nate and Mikko going to show up at all? Or just going to wait for the PP
It's weird, I'm not even sure they time stamp different camera angles so that they can glue together evidence when/if one camera angle is partially obstructed.Also how the f*** does it happen that in the year of our lord 2024 is there not enough camera angles and tech to make sure every goal line and blue line challenge conclusive?
Cheapskate joke league
I'm betting the video crew had the blue line camera sectional still to work with and told the bench to call it.Again I was looking at the same broadcast, and it was tough to tell where on the stick the puck was. That's my argument, how the f*** did Bednar and staff see the puck to make the challenge?
Rants misses the net. Surprise surprise.
67% face off winsSick and tired of Mikko, he ain’t shit no more
Clearly the rule change we need is to paint the puck orange so it stands out.Listen I'm with you, I don't even think the play was onside. My issue is that still shot doesn't definitively prove that it was onside. How can you conclusively say that that puck is on the blue line with that shitty still shot?
Clearly the rule change we need is to paint the puck orange so it stands out.
I care because I'm just some f***in dude on the internet and I'm allowed to be angry at bsWho f***ing cares about offsides or not. Come back and score more goals.