BinCookin
Registered User
For the most part, I have found that Ken Holland has done a very good job of not overpaying players that we have signed.
I was taking a look at the CAP #'s recently and looking at our roster. It seems as though our Forwards are moderately underpaid, and our defense is a little overpaid considering the players and each cap hit.
Using these numbers and extrapolations. Which players do you think we risk losing as a result of cap problems? Can we keep all our forwards that can fit on the roster? Can we keep the Defense with this price structure?
Seems to me we need to cut salary in D. And probably just wait for our forwards to get paid more fairly in later contracts for their "raise".
Maybe this is just me noticing that our forwards are younger than our D core. And thus the Cap #'s seem to work this way.
Also how much room does our current structure allow for additional players to be added by UFA over the next few years?
http://www.generalfanager.com/teams/detroit-red-wings
http://war-on-ice.com/cap/DET.html
I was taking a look at the CAP #'s recently and looking at our roster. It seems as though our Forwards are moderately underpaid, and our defense is a little overpaid considering the players and each cap hit.
Using these numbers and extrapolations. Which players do you think we risk losing as a result of cap problems? Can we keep all our forwards that can fit on the roster? Can we keep the Defense with this price structure?
Seems to me we need to cut salary in D. And probably just wait for our forwards to get paid more fairly in later contracts for their "raise".
Maybe this is just me noticing that our forwards are younger than our D core. And thus the Cap #'s seem to work this way.
Also how much room does our current structure allow for additional players to be added by UFA over the next few years?
http://www.generalfanager.com/teams/detroit-red-wings
http://war-on-ice.com/cap/DET.html