2025 NHL Draft: Baggin' for Hagens

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,707
14,209
Folsom
I really like Matthew Schaefer, he’s my favorite going into next season. I really hope Hensler puts together a great draft season in the NCAA, because I was pretty disappointed by him at the U18. But there’s a ton of big guys up front like Martone, Spence, McQueen and some great Euros like Frondell and Ryabkin that make this an exciting draft on paper so far.

We will have to draft a defenseman at some point, but let’s cross that bridge when we get there.
What do you think of Trethewey? Right now, being as early as it is, if we don't land Hagens at the top, he'd be my target. Him or Hensler would be great picks.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
48,196
18,162
Bay Area
What do you think of Trethewey? Right now, being as early as it is, if we don't land Hagens at the top, he'd be my target. Him or Hensler would be great picks.
Never seen him. Seems like more of a potential Vegas pick at this point, but that could change.
 

matt trick

Registered User
Jun 12, 2007
9,834
1,480
Much like Chicago with Bedard, having Celebrini makes it so much easier to be less nervous next year.

A franchise winger, an elite dman, a big two-way center are all viable at 3-6 overall. In 2024 draft in particular there was exactly one guy we had to have. If 2024 group minus Celebrini was the 2025 draft I'd be pretty happy to add a guy like Buium, Levshunov, Lindstrom, Demidov, or Silayev. Not over the moon, but the rebuild doesn't start until you have the franchise C or franchise D, and the D-man is easier to find. Though I'm not opposed to a trade up and grabbing one this year anyway. 2025 looks like it may have a better top 5 however.

From 2016-2025 (10 year post McDavid-era) I think Celebrini has a very real shot to be the 4th-6th best player (Matthews, Makar, Hughes, Bedard, Hagens). That's wild! We got our first ever #1 pick, but we also got an above average #1 guy.
 

Stewie Griffin

What the deuce
May 9, 2019
5,065
8,126
Canada
From 2016-2025 (10 year post McDavid-era) I think Celebrini has a very real shot to be the 4th-6th best player (Matthews, Makar, Hughes, Bedard, Hagens). That's wild! We got our first ever #1 pick, but we also got an above average #1 guy.
I wouldn't put Hagens above him yet until we see him in college. Celebrini just won the hobey baker as the youngest player while being a very sound two-way forward as well. But yeah we have a very strong 1st overall pick. Hopefully the leader of our next team.

An ideal pick next year would be Hensler, Martone, or Schaefer. Obviously I want a top D, but Martone is a kind of guy with good size and can play with anyone.
 

coooldude

Registered User
Jul 25, 2007
3,427
2,848
I wouldn't put Hagens above him yet until we see him in college. Celebrini just won the hobey baker as the youngest player while being a very sound two-way forward as well. But yeah we have a very strong 1st overall pick. Hopefully the leader of our next team.

An ideal pick next year would be Hensler, Martone, or Schaefer. Obviously I want a top D, but Martone is a kind of guy with good size and can play with anyone.
It's way too early to say anything at all really, but if I had to put money on it, I'd say that Hagens will score more points but Macklin might be as good or better of a centerpiece. I honestly feel the same way about Bedard (although as I said Tuesday, it's still likely the endorphins).

Macklin just plays such a sound complete game. Grier responded to the Toews comparison with Horvat and Bergeron, any of those outcomes is an incredible piece for a contender vs just a points producer.

I'm with you on Hensler, Martone, and Schaefer at this way too early juncture.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
48,196
18,162
Bay Area
I wouldn't put Hagens above him yet until we see him in college. Celebrini just won the hobey baker as the youngest player while being a very sound two-way forward as well. But yeah we have a very strong 1st overall pick. Hopefully the leader of our next team.

An ideal pick next year would be Hensler, Martone, or Schaefer. Obviously I want a top D, but Martone is a kind of guy with good size and can play with anyone.
That’s exactly the trio I was think of that I wanted next year, assuming everyone progresses well. It’s nice that we don’t have to worry about getting a center, as centers tend to be prioritized and could mean that even if we end up with like, 4th overall or something, we still get our guy.

Schaefer: smooth-skating two-way D, solid size at 6’1”
Hensler: physical shutdown RHD
Martone: the closest thing to a Tkachuk we’ve seen at the top of the draft since Brady himself
 

Jargon

Registered User
Apr 12, 2011
5,785
9,848
Venice, California
Jux, I think you said this already, but m
Much like Chicago with Bedard, having Celebrini makes it so much easier to be less nervous next year.

A franchise winger, an elite dman, a big two-way center are all viable at 3-6 overall. In 2024 draft in particular there was exactly one guy we had to have. If 2024 group minus Celebrini was the 2025 draft I'd be pretty happy to add a guy like Buium, Levshunov, Lindstrom, Demidov, or Silayev. Not over the moon, but the rebuild doesn't start until you have the franchise C or franchise D, and the D-man is easier to find. Though I'm not opposed to a trade up and grabbing one this year anyway. 2025 looks like it may have a better top 5 however.

From 2016-2025 (10 year post McDavid-era) I think Celebrini has a very real shot to be the 4th-6th best player (Matthews, Makar, Hughes, Bedard, Hagens). That's wild! We got our first ever #1 pick, but we also got an above average #1 guy.

I came here to say the same thing. I think Jux mentioned it too - but it makes next year feel a lot less desperate. I can cheer for the Sharks knowing we’re still going to suck and have a high pick to add to our very nice pool, without having to pick THE guy — ‘cause we finally got him.
 

PattyLafontaine

Registered User
Apr 5, 2006
2,650
960
I'm beggin' for Hagens. (Insert favorite version of Beggin' (MadCon, Maneskin, etc.))

Much better defensive pool in 2025.

As always need to see of players develop, but Hagens looks like a #1 OA. The Sharks are still going to be awful in 2024-2025 and I expect them to finish in the bottom 3 in the standings.

Need to see what Smitha nd Celebrini look like in the NHL before committing big money in UFA. The Sharks should spend to the floor and use cap space to get picks for eating up bad contracts.

Not every draft pick will be in San Jose and some will certainly fail. I think the best route of picking up good D-man if it doesn't happen in the draft is via trade of prospects/picks.
 

landshark

They'll paint the donkey teal if you pay.
Sponsor
Mar 15, 2003
3,495
2,781
outer richmond dist
I'm beggin' for Hagens. (Insert favorite version of Beggin' (MadCon, Maneskin, etc.))

Much better defensive pool in 2025.

As always need to see of players develop, but Hagens looks like a #1 OA. The Sharks are still going to be awful in 2024-2025 and I expect them to finish in the bottom 3 in the standings.

Need to see what Smitha nd Celebrini look like in the NHL before committing big money in UFA. The Sharks should spend to the floor and use cap space to get picks for eating up bad contracts.

Not every draft pick will be in San Jose and some will certainly fail. I think the best route of picking up good D-man if it doesn't happen in the draft is via trade of prospects/picks.
Not sure who MadCon or Maneskin are, but this is my preferred version of Beggin'...
 

matt trick

Registered User
Jun 12, 2007
9,834
1,480
I wouldn't put Hagens above him yet until we see him in college. Celebrini just won the hobey baker as the youngest player while being a very sound two-way forward as well. But yeah we have a very strong 1st overall pick. Hopefully the leader of our next team.

An ideal pick next year would be Hensler, Martone, or Schaefer. Obviously I want a top D, but Martone is a kind of guy with good size and can play with anyone.

It's way too early to say anything at all really, but if I had to put money on it, I'd say that Hagens will score more points but Macklin might be as good or better of a centerpiece. I honestly feel the same way about Bedard (although as I said Tuesday, it's still likely the endorphins).

Macklin just plays such a sound complete game. Grier responded to the Toews comparison with Horvat and Bergeron, any of those outcomes is an incredible piece for a contender vs just a points producer.

I'm with you on Hensler, Martone, and Schaefer at this way too early juncture.

That's why I said 4-6th! Not convinced Bedard will be better either. Bedard is already an elite scorer and with a better supporting cast could have proven to be a top 10 center this year. I'd be surprised if he isn't next year. With regards to the top 4, I don't see Matthews, Makar, MacKinnon, and McDavid getting passed by Celebrini, but if he does, none of us will complain!

Loving the deep dive into Celebrini's game. I think he's going to be the best offensive and defensive forward we've ever drafted. Pretty damn sweet!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

stator

Registered User
Apr 17, 2012
5,051
1,034
San Jose
In an ideal perfect world, we get Celebrini and one of Parekh/Yakemchuk with the PIT pick this year. Hensler next year. Then our young core lineup looks like:

Eklund-Celebrini-X
Musty-Smith-Zetterlund
Bystedt-Edstrom-Guschin
X-X-X (whoever)

X-Hensler
Muhkamadulin-Parekh
Thrun-Emberson

That would be great. Not including any currently drafted or about to be drafted 2nd rounders (or VGK 1st). Also doesn't include any veterans we could get in FA or trade.

I like that lineup.

No love for Cagnoli, Halttunen, Havelid or Bordeleau?

Just plug those guys into the X spots. I apprehensive on Havlid simply because his name is too close to Havlat.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan

JotAlan

Registered User
Apr 21, 2020
372
194
In an ideal perfect world, we get Celebrini and one of Parekh/Yakemchuk with the PIT pick this year. Hensler next year. Then our young core lineup looks like:

Eklund-Celebrini-X
Musty-Smith-Zetterlund
Bystedt-Edstrom-Guschin
X-X-X (whoever)

X-Hensler
Muhkamadulin-Parekh
Thrun-Emberson

That would be great. Not including any currently drafted or about to be drafted 2nd rounders (or VGK 1st). Also doesn't include any veterans we could get in FA or trade.

Now imagine getting Hagens next year, playing Smith on the wing and having:

Eklund-Celebrini-Smith
Musty-Hagens-Zetterlund
Bystedt-Edstrom-xxx
X-X-X (whoever)
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
48,196
18,162
Bay Area
Useless players such has Hoffman and Lebanc going out, good young talent coming in. Should easily translate to at least 8 or so more wins over last season.
Setting aside how you came up with that arbitrary number, you do realize that winning 8 more games last year would have still put us bottom-3 in the league, right?
 

Bizz

2023 LTIR Loophole* Cup Champions
Oct 17, 2007
11,183
6,981
San Jose
Obviously there's gonna be more factors in play, but I truly believe our "bottoming out" happened last season. There's no way we don't show improvement, even if it's the slightest.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad