I am not surprised. It echoes what the Maven said. Barzal also playing down Tavares leadership ability. The Isles do not miss it, they only miss his individualistic goals. But I don't know if he could play as an equal under Trotz. The bottom line is they have not only been better without him at Captain, but better with Lee as a Captain. I don't care if people think this is a shot at Pajamas, but he was never a great leader of the Isles, nor could he lead them to more success. The fact that Lee did, in his first season as Captain, and with 103 pts more than the 8 years Pajamas was a captain says enough to me.
Sorry I have to disagree. The Islanders shortcoming offensively and on the powerplay is attributed to their focus on defense AND the fact that the Isles are not that strong up the middle. Lack of talent is the problem period. JT would have only helped here. He is good defensively and dynamic enough to have fit in. The Leafs have 3 top centers that are better than the Islanders centers and that is one of the reasons the Leafs score goals and the Isles struggle. Their defense and goaltending is their issue.
IMO the Islanders success can not be attributed to the loss of JT. As the season went on I downplay the “us vs the world” mentality that existed early on this season. It is defense which elevated their goaltending = success. Not losing JT.
You have to look no further than the last Isles - Toronto game as to what JT is today. It sucks to say it but it is real. The Isles would have won the division had they won that game.
It annoys me that fans try to create an alternate history. JT is proving his worth every day now. He is elite. That does not mean the Leafs will win a series this season. This is no Leafs or JT love fest. The Leafs are faced with a near-impossible task vs the Boston Bruins IMO.
I get the argument long term and I agree JT will not be able to perform at his elite level 5-6-7 years from now but I would have been delighted to have him years 0-4. That is the Leafs window.
The next question becomes, will Lee be able to perform at a high level in 5-6 years of his new deal wherever he signs? It is reported the hangup on a new deal is length of contract. It will play itself out, but I doubt LL will accept 7-8 years. We would not have been happy had JT signed that long. Hopefully LL overpays Lee in years 1-4 and pays a lot less in years 5-6 and 7-8 is not necessary. Either way, the threat of Lee leaving is real IMO as LL remains focused on Belmont as the top priority.