What if you could have the all star game....every game?
What if you could have the all star game....every game?
Who the hell would play in goal in such a series? Goodbye groin and hips.
Probably a bunch of CHL/College hockey cast-offs who never made it to the pros.
Will literally not even watch highlights. 3 on 3 sucks.
3 on 3 is an established version of hockey played at many levels. The big difference is that real 3-on-3 usually has smaller ice surfaces so it really changes the amount of space you have, and thus how fast you have to play, and the strategies you can employ.3-on-3 overtime is the worst hockey I have ever watched. You're just basically waiting for your opponent to make a worse mistake than you. Like, a common tactic is to intentionally put your team offside by giving up the o-zone while you have possession. It's just awful hockey.
Why the hell would someone try to build an entire league around this gimmick and expect it to be profitable?
lmao wtf
New Era of Pro Hockey | Major League Hockey
Get ready to witness an exciting new era of professional hockey in North America, set to launch in fall 2024. A unique 3 on 3 hockey format featuring teams of professionals with a $30 million salary cap per team and a $100,000 victory bonus for each winning team.www.majorleaguehockey.com
AHL players are making like 100K on average and most NHL-contracted players there are in the million-dollar range so their payroll isn't going to crest over $10M often, most of which being covered by the parent NHL team. AHL teams are also generally in either well-supported hockey markets or have a good arena situation.
This mystery league with a completely different format and absolutely no information about either teams or their infrastructure are saying payroll will have a $30M cap per team.
So far this league has as much traction as the Neko Sparks bid for the Senators.
$25M per year to auston matthews to play in arizona, $100k per year each to you and me and the hockey equivalent of cameron brink...
Unlike a circuit-style sport, the Saudis can't just flash some cash and pretend it'll make a dent on a major sport league. They don't have just to meet payroll, they have to secure arena leases through the season (and many will demand multi-year leases), hire front offices for each team, coaching/training/scouting/supporting staff, arrange broadcast/streaming deals and so forth. There's a shitton of staff and infrastructure that needs to be accounted for before a team can even be functional.forget AHL players... $25M per year to auston matthews to play in arizona, $100k per year each to you and me and the hockey equivalent of cameron brink...
want to have even more fun? let's get connor bedard the f*** out of that scumbag organization and back home to BC.... gretzky/wha style.
I don't follow the sport whatsoever so no idea how it happened, LIV golf was/is funded just fine? This has to be Saudi funded. $500m means less to them than to the rest of us
Challengers don't arrive in this context, bruh.Have we definitively figured out whose reputation and/or money laundering initiative this is yet? I'm assuming either Saudi Arabia or Qatar, but maybe a new challenger has arrived.
Challengers don't arrive in this context, bruh.
They emerge.