Why did Montreal draft Kotkaniemi in 2018?

Status
Not open for further replies.

LeProspector

AINEC
Feb 14, 2017
5,031
5,654
One of the dumbest draft decisions ever, drafting Kotkaniemi over Brady Tkachuk, Quinn Hughes, Evan Bouchard and Noah Dobson.

Why did Montreal do it? Looked bad at the time, Looks even worse in hindsight. It was a decision that set the team back 10 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AvroArrow

Seb

All we are is Dustin Byfuglien
Jul 15, 2006
17,479
12,966
Because he had a very interesting profile. The pick itself wasn't bad, he is a failure because of these two reasons :

1- Horrible development
2- His own motivation to get better
 

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
3,067
3,560
Insistent on a center.

His stock rose late in the year but even then I don't think anybody had him going higher than five over the consensus Dahlin/Svechnikov/Tkachuk/Zadina.

The reports had come out right before the draft that Montreal wanted him though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MasterMatt25

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
22,750
15,654
Because they needed a center.

Insistent on a center.

His stock rose late in the year but even then I don't think anybody had him going higher than five over the consensus Dahlin/Svechnikov/Tkachuk/Zadina.

The reports had come out right before the draft that Montreal wanted him though.
Kotkaniemi wasn't even considered top 10. He was like top 15.

Then, after the season was over and no games were played anymore, Kotkaniemi's stock rose, most likely because the reporters caught wind that Montreal wanted to pick him.

But analysis during the season had Kotkaniemi closer to the #15 range.
 

5cotland

NFR
Jan 23, 2015
3,864
4,589
Scotland
Because he had a very interesting profile. The pick itself wasn't bad, he is a failure because of these two reasons :

1- Horrible development
2- His own motivation to get better
The pick was pretty bad. He was ranked between 10-15. The only person to rank him higher was Bob McKenzie.

The Habs took a risk and went way off the board.
 

MasterMatt25

Registered User
Nov 19, 2014
3,774
2,613
Montreal
Because they needed a center.


Kotkaniemi wasn't even considered top 10. He was like top 15.

Then, after the season was over and no games were played anymore, Kotkaniemi's stock rose, most likely because the reporters caught wind that Montreal wanted to pick him.

But analysis during the season had Kotkaniemi closer to the #15 range.
He was ranked in the top 10 by Button and McKenzie in the month prior to the draft
 

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
4,816
2,284
One of the dumbest draft decisions ever, drafting Kotkaniemi over Brady Tkachuk, Quinn Hughes, Evan Bouchard and Noah Dobson.

Why did Montreal do it? Looked bad at the time, Looks even worse in hindsight. It was a decision that set the team back 10 years.
Same reason Detroit drafted Zadina and Arizona Hayton. They thought they were the player who would help them the most going forward.

KK was actually not a bad pick considering what he did at 18 years old. The issue was after. They should have sent him down to the AHL. He essentially never progressed outside of gaining upper body strength, he's essentially bigger and can lay a good hit of he can catch you (not often with this skating...).

A better question would be why Carolina offer sheet him...
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
4,816
2,284
Because he had a very interesting profile. The pick itself wasn't bad, he is a failure because of these two reasons :

1- Horrible development
2- His own motivation to get better
This, but management should've seen it coming and send him down. I believe, from the multiple comments from journalists, ex teammates and coaches, that he become/is entitled.
 

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
3,067
3,560
Because they needed a center.


Kotkaniemi wasn't even considered top 10. He was like top 15.

Then, after the season was over and no games were played anymore, Kotkaniemi's stock rose, most likely because the reporters caught wind that Montreal wanted to pick him.

But analysis during the season had Kotkaniemi closer to the #15 range.

Lol...

 

Chan790

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2012
3,913
2,445
Bingy town, NY
A better question would be why Carolina offer sheet him...

Needed a centre and he looked like he had interesting potential.
Clearly, because we made the same mistake y'all did. The potential is there and it's very appealing. A two-way, all-situations, top-6 C with size. The execution doesn't meet the expectations though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CanadienShark

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
3,067
3,560
Same reason Detroit drafted Zadina and Arizona Hayton. They thought they were the player who would help them the most going forward.

KK was actually not a bad pick considering what he did at 18 years old. The issue was after. They should have sent him down to the AHL. He essentially never progressed outside of gaining upper body strength, he's essentially bigger and can lay a good hit of he can catch you (not often with this skating...).

A better question would be why Carolina offer sheet him...
We all know why Carolina offer sheeted him lol.

Shot their own dick off trying to get their get back.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jfhabs

Danarqhy

Registered User
Oct 27, 2022
300
1,235
Check Republic
youtube.com
Was he a bad pick or does this guy's attitude and determination to get better just stink? he's going to be 24 now, feels like he hasn't gotten better since his draft year. Total stagnation in development hints more that this dud has a terrible attitude problem.
 

Gainesvillain

Registered User
Apr 9, 2013
1,535
1,393
One of the dumbest draft decisions ever, drafting Kotkaniemi over Brady Tkachuk, Quinn Hughes, Evan Bouchard and Noah Dobson.

Why did Montreal do it? Looked bad at the time, Looks even worse in hindsight. It was a decision that set the team back 10 years.
Positional need.

Ironically, if you could create a player in a laboratory to be absolutely ideal for then-GM Marc Bergevin and head scout Trevor Timmins, that player would look exactly like Brady Tkachuk. And they blithely passed on him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfhabs

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
11,441
21,994
Montreal
Was he a bad pick or does this guy's attitude and determination to get better just stink? he's going to be 24 now, feels like he hasn't gotten better since his draft year. Total stagnation in development hints more that this dud has a terrible attitude problem.
Both
 

CTHabsfan

Registered User
Jul 28, 2007
1,254
922
Jesperi Kotkaniemi's stock was rising during his draft season, going from being projected as a late 1st-round pick to being an early 1st-rounder. Marc Bergevin had not been able to draft or develop a #1 centre for the Canadiens and felt like he could not pass on KK. If I remember correctly, Bergevin looked to trade down at the draft but decided against it when he knew that he could not drop down and still get Kotkaniemi.

It's easy to look back and say Bergevin should have drafted Tkachuk (that's who I wanted), but he would have been crucified if he passed on Kotkaniemi and KK developed into a #1 centre for another team.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Coaches Coroner

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
4,816
2,284
Clearly, because we made the same mistake y'all did. The potential is there and it's very appealing. A two-way, all-situations, top-6 C with size. The execution doesn't meet the expectations though.
Still believe that...? That same year there were at least 4 players better than KK worth the offer sheet.

Clearly they thought he had some.potential, but it was a revenge offer sheet.
 

Rorschach

Who the f*** is Trevor Moore?
Oct 9, 2006
11,320
1,879
Los Angeles
One of the dumbest draft decisions ever, drafting Kotkaniemi over Brady Tkachuk, Quinn Hughes, Evan Bouchard and Noah Dobson.

Why did Montreal do it? Looked bad at the time, Looks even worse in hindsight. It was a decision that set the team back 10 years.

Donut hole at center. They even traded for Dvorak to help fill this need.
 

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
4,816
2,284
Clearly, because we made the same mistake y'all did. The potential is there and it's very appealing. A two-way, all-situations, top-6 C with size. The execution doesn't meet the expectations though.
Still believe that...? That same year there were at least 4 players better than KK worth the offer sheet.

Clearly they thought he had some.potential, but it was a revenge offer sheet
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
28,846
23,692
East Coast
Same reason they drafted Reinbacher last year, he was the best at his position available.

Awful way to run the draft table
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad