Carson Soucy to have a hearing for Cross-check to Connor McDavid - suspended 1 game (MOD WARNING IN OP)

[Leonardo87]

MOD NOTE:

If you can't post in here without constantly trying to troll each other, you won't be posting in here. Consider this the one and only warning you'll get.

Click to read more...

 

[rea]

Normally my old schoolness would lead me to stand on the side of the offending party, but I can’t do it here. If 97 threw a cheap slash cheap slash him back. This is a cross check to the face. Those aren’t samesies. It doesn’t matter what you believe Soucy’s intent to be was. He extended his arms straight forward and high, he was going to catch him high in the chest at best. That’s a big time shot that can easily go wrong, and if you believe there’s no intent it clearly went wrong. What matters is the result not the intent here.

The result was a pretty nasty cross check to the chops. I like Soucy, but he deserves this. If you want to fine 97 for a slash then go ahead. The cross check to the face has to be dealt with.

Why the cross check? What doesn’t anyone just take the other hand off the stick and shove the guy anymore? The cross checks are out of hand and now Soucy has put himself in a position to be made an example of. If you think Zads should pay Soucy some cash for helping him lose some income and time then so be it….but Soucy had a lot of others options besides straight up extending hard into a cross check. If he had just grabbed 97 by the collar and punched him in the face I’d probably be fine with it.

It's the playoffs, they don't get paid haha, no loss of income.

 

[Canovin]

Hyman should get one too then no?

2 for Soucy and 1 for Hyman but decided 1 for Soucy and call it a day.

 

[notsocommonsense]

Ok DOPS, now do Hyman

 

[snag]

What about that requires protection?

Soucy didn't drill McDavid from behind into the boards when he was in a vulnerable position. He responded to McDavid slashing him. Taking disciplinary action wouldn't be protecting McDavid, it would be giving him a free pass to break the rules without consequence.

Slashing pants vs a crosscheck to the face (or throat had he not been hit by Zadorov.

Ok.

 

[ziploc]

NHL DoPS continues to be a joke.

Oh well. Juulsen draws in, it's a downgrade but he has been very good at times this season.

 

[Killer Orcas]

Right decision

So if it's right where's Hyman's 1 game for doing exact same thing in same scrum?

 

[Neil Racki]

Hyman getting a game too then?

Nope ... yet another thread critical of an Oiler is deleted

3 now?

 

[bleedgreen]

It's the playoffs, they don't get paid haha, no loss of income.

They can always be fined.

 

[notsocommonsense]

Wait. It was in defense of what? Was he threatened? Him going into the scrum was defensive act in itself, this was an offensive attack.

Zadorov’s head was threatening his stick silly

 

[rea]

They can always be fined.

Yea but soucy wasn't, he was suspended. No harm no foul, zad don't need to help pay

 

[Bgav]

So why is this not a suspension?

 

[bleedgreen]

Yea but soucy wasn't, he was suspended. No harm no foul, zad don't need to help pay

He can buy him a bottle of wine with an apology card.

 

[ziploc]

Hyman can't be suspended because he didn't crosscheck a star in the face.

McDavid did highstick a star in the face but he can't be penalised because he is a star.

Kane slewfooted a star twice but he can't be penalised because....reasons?

 

[Walkingthroughforest]

In a vacuum, one game is fair. In the context of the rest of these playoffs it’s laughable.

This wouldn’t have even made the highlights if it wasn’t McDavid. Parros needs to be removed.

 

[rea]

Zadorov’s head was threatening his stick silly

Damnit!

He can buy him a bottle of wine with an apology card.

Done and done! But only if it's a comedic apology card, we don't want to ruin big z's image with some sentimental crap

 

[StoveTopStauffer]

Hyman one is a non-issue really. Just the league's quest to even things up to reduce the whines and cries.

 

[BCNate]

NHL DoPS continues to be a joke.

Oh well. Juulsen draws in, it's a downgrade but he has been very good at times this season.

Game 4 should be pretty heated. I have no problem with Juulsen in, he is tough as they come.

 

[Red]

An utterly disgraceful decision to suspend a guy for that but not the Hyman crosscheck to the head.

This league continues to be a joke. It clearly favours certain teams and certain players. Shameful that they continue to this without any consequence.

 

[Canovin]

Game 4 should be pretty heated. I have no problem with Juulsen in, he is tough as they come.

Injury prone Juulsen? What is he going to do?

 

[Bertuzzzi44]

Expected. Now we await the Hyman ruling.

Hearing 1 game for Hyman which is BS, should be 2 minimum, his wasn’t reactionary to a slash, he came in preplanned with intent to injure.

 

[Red]

Slashing pants vs a crosscheck to the face (or throat had he not been hit by Zadorov.

Ok.

Cool so you agree that Hyman should be suspended two games for an intentional crosscheck to the face of Zadorov.

 

[nucks88]

Hearing 1 game for Hyman which is BS, should be 2 minimum, he came in preplanned with intent to injure.

Source please?

 

[notsocommonsense]

Hearing 1 game for Hyman which is BS, should be 2 minimum, he came in preplanned with intent to injure.

Where are you hearing this? 1 game is fine, consistency matters

 

[tny760]

In a vacuum, one game is fair. In the context of the rest of these playoffs it’s laughable.

This wouldn’t have even made the highlights if it wasn’t McDavid. Parros needs to be removed.

i think it would have still been a highlight just because of the fact that it was as the game ended. definitely not in line with how the dops has been acting in the playoffs but if there's one thing you can count on from them it's inconsistency

 

[Iggys Dome]

Hearing 1 game for Hyman which is BS, should be 2 minimum, his wasn’t reactionary to a slash, he came in preplanned with intent to injure.

Hearing from who exactly?