Post-Game Talk: ECSF GAME 4 - The officials throw The Bear off the cliff - Sunrise 3 BRUINS 2 - Panthers lead series 3-1

[KillerMillerTime]

It’s was 2-2 after that and bruins folded like a bunch of babies and had 2 shots in the 3rd period.

They weren’t winning that game even if that goal got disallowed.

Is that based on one of your 100 other realities?

 

[UncleRico]

Is that based on one of your 100 other realities?

No just common sense. It’s a tough one to come by around here. 99.999% of goals come from shots on net.

 

[Gonzothe7thDman]

No just common sense. It’s a tough one to come by around here. 99.999% of goals come from shots on net.

Do you have proof of that assertion?

 

[goflyakite]

It’s was 2-2 after that and bruins folded like a bunch of babies and had 2 shots in the 3rd period.

They weren’t winning that game even if that goal got disallowed.

You love expected stats don’t you? If Bennett gets called for GI or just interference in general, the odds were in the Bruins favour to win the game.

 

[UncleRico]

Do you have proof of that assertion?

Hahaha damn I do not. It might actually be 99.6% that rogue pass out of the D zone on empty betters might bite me in that ass on this one.

 

[KillerMillerTime]

No just common sense. It’s a tough one to come by around here. 99.999% of goals come from shots on net.

This is funny coming from someone that won't say how he came up with a specific %.
Still waiting for an answer UR.

 

[goflyakite]

except bruins never scored again and florida ended up winning 6-2 and would have been 5-2 if you took away the power play goal.



The bruins lost 6-2. One changed penalty isn’t changing a 6-2 game.

Also the second post you quoted is actually referring to last nights game.

 

[UncleRico]

This is funny coming from someone that won't say how he came up with a specific %.

What percentage of goals do you think come from non shots?

 

[KillerMillerTime]

What percentage of goals do you think come from non shots?

Keep deflecting buddy, that's weaksauce.

 

[UncleRico]

Keep deflecting buddy, that's weaksauce.

Not deflecting at all are you drunk?

Bruins aren’t winning games with 2 shots a period.

 

[ON3M4N]

W

Yes I do, but Bruins are weakest team in playoffs at centre.Why do u care so much about Maroon.

I care about the team as a whole. That's why I'm not sure why we have to focus solely on center holes first before we do anything else.

 

[KillerMillerTime]

What percentage of goals do you think come from non shots?

How did you get your percentage? With that great commonsense only you possess?

 

[ON3M4N]

Paulo have any better # than any top 6 guys?

Who?

 

[JRull86]

It’s was 2-2 after that and bruins folded like a bunch of babies and had 2 shots in the 3rd period.

They weren’t winning that game even if that goal got disallowed.

Why do you even follow the team/post here?

Negative 1000% of the time.

The canucks won with 18 sog last night. That goal was a massive play in the game, clearly deflated them.

It's entirely disingenuous to claim they wouldn't have won anyways. Maybe true, but well never have any idea because the league is run by a bunch of f***ing blind clowns.

 

[bobbyorr04]

Thank you. The game in discussion is the one with Bennnetts hit

I was talking about last night's game where Bennett should not have been playing

The refs have a lot more to do with a teams failure or success than you think...especially in the playoffs

 

[UncleRico]

You guys are right the bruins are losing because the refs and consistently having 5 shots or less in a period is a recipe for success!

 

[goflyakite]

You guys are right the bruins are losing because the refs and consistently having 5 shots or less in a period is a recipe for success!

Have you been training with Joe Pavelski in the off season? Your deflection skills are out of this world!

 

[UncleRico]

Why do you even follow the team/post here?

Negative 1000% of the time.

The canucks won with 18 sog last night. That goal was a massive play in the game, clearly deflated them.

It's entirely disingenuous to claim they wouldn't have won anyways. Maybe true, but well never have any idea because the league is run by a bunch of f***ing blind clowns.

Because I like the team and a lot of people here.

Just sick of the non stop cry baby attitude a lot of people have here blaming the refs.

You are more than free to use the ignore button if you’re feelings are hurt.

 

[KillerMillerTime]

Who?

Lauko

 

[JRull86]

You guys are right the bruins are losing because the refs and consistently having 5 shots or less in a period is a recipe for success!

Literally no one is saying that, FLA is clearly the better team.

But you can't go early look at the officiating in the series ESPECIALLY LAST NIGHT, and say that it didn't effect the outcome of the game.

 

[KillerMillerTime]

Not deflecting at all are you drunk?

Bruins aren’t winning games with 2 shots a period.

Get real no one is saying that.

Not deflecting at all are you drunk?

Bruins aren’t winning games with 2 shots a period.

I asked you a question. You answered it with a question that had nothing to do with mine. That's classic deflection.

Now answer my question, how did you come up with your 95%.

 

[Aussie Bruin]

No one is as bad as Vancouver. Two losses two riots...lol.


They literally make millions and will provide for their grandchildren. They ain't rocking any boats for us...lol.

Well exactly. But is that how it should be?

 

[LouJersey]

Should Bennett have been penalized & suspended? Should Ekblad been penalized with Lauko? Those were important events in G3 and series.

Game 3 was 3-0 at the time, That killed any hope of a comeback, but it was still one sided. Game 4 was the killer. Call a penalty on Bennett and take the goal away you may and probably win that game.

 

[UncleRico]

Literally no one is saying that, FLA is clearly the better team.

But you can't go early look at the officiating in the series ESPECIALLY LAST NIGHT, and say that it didn't effect the outcome of the game.

Amazing how you can say no one is saying that then the next sentence you write is about how refs are changing the outcomes of games.

Contradicting yourself by the sentence.

Get real no one is saying that.


I asked you a question. You answered it with a question that had nothing to do with mine. That's classic deflection.

Now answer my question, how did you come up with your 95%.

Alright ya I think you’re inebriated. You just double quoted my post and responded to it twice individually lmao

 

[frankiess]

Because I like the team and a lot of people here.

Just sick of the non stop cry baby attitude a lot of people have here blaming the refs.

You are more than free to use the ignore button if you’re feelings are hurt.

Uncle, the reffing last night was shit. That's not blaming, that's a fact.