ZachaFlockaFlame
Registered User
- Aug 24, 2020
- 14,096
- 18,066
I mean Fitz blows this decision and he's getting fired no matter how good the roster he makes. It's basically his entire GM tenure wrapped up in one decision.
Two vet coaches lol...but then again Shero did two rookie coaches and that didn't work out any better either.We did the vet coach and look where it got us.
I have faith in Fitz.
I mean Fitz blows this decision and he's getting fired no matter how good the roster he makes. It's basically his entire GM tenure wrapped up in one decision.
It's a lot easier to play under pressure and stay hungry when you're the hunter coming out of nowhere (last year) as opposed to a hunted team that's expected to win (this year). We saw some of that last year against the Rangers when they ****ed up the first two games from pillar to post, then when it went back to zero expectations then they played well again.Personally, I think the best form of accountability isn’t imposed top down by a coach, but naturally develops bottom up as a team when the team has bought in to the vision. You still need the right coach to build and communicate that vision, but then it’s on the players to see it, engage with it, and move it forward. The guys need to be accountable to each other and that only works with real buy in.
If you want a lazy psychological explanation for why the team has kept playing badly after Ruff got canned, it’s because there (still) isn’t a compelling vision because we have an interim guy who was here all year. Besides, even if there were something to buy into it’s hard to build that in what, despite some low probability dreams, is ultimately a lame duck part of the season for the team.
the guys on the team didn’t just stop being resilient over the off-season. Just need to be built back up to it.
Fitz's version would be Fitz, Green and Brylin (or dare I say, Marty lol)I'd rather have gotten the N. Bench 2,0 than this Travis Green nonsense.
Lou works somewhere else, so his spot would be taken by Fitz.
Oates, Stevens, Fitzgerald. That would be a fine three headed monster of a coaching staff!
Yeah, I was gonna say Marty, since he's actually here now and Oates/Stevens are not..Fitz's version would be Fitz, Green and Brylin (or dare I say, Marty lol)
Nah, it'd be Fitz, Hughes, and Hughes since the Hughes brothers run things.Fitz's version would be Fitz, Green and Brylin (or dare I say, Marty lol)
Travis Green makes me love Todd McLellan.
I'm in the bargaining stage of grief where I would accept him after suffering through 14 games of Travis Green.no offense bleed, but if we hire mclellan i'm going to have to block you lol
Did Berube try to cheap shot his players and sucker punch them in the back of the head the way he did when that talentless piece of shit played?I don’t think Berube does much tbh
Craig Berube, honest and blunt as they come, simply ran out of time in St. Louis. Hired five years ago, he was universally praised by the players upon winning the Stanley Cup eight months after he took over. He coached like he played: unceasing, demanding and challenging.
I always think of Larry Bird’s rule for coaching: three years maximum, because even the players who love playing for you get tired of you.
If there’s one thing that needs to be changed right away, it is the defensive zone. The Blues are one of the worst teams in the NHL at defending the slot, allowing a higher percentage of chances from there than almost every team. Armstrong alluded to that when asked about his defencemen: “When our team game suffers, (our defence) and our goalie looks the worst. And our variance on a nightly basis is concerning.”
Sound familiar ?
32 Thoughts: What’s next for the Blues after Craig Berube firing? – Sportsnet.ca